Skip to content

Update pyiron_workflow to 0.19.1 - #200

Draft
jan-janssen wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
pyiron_workflow
Draft

Update pyiron_workflow to 0.19.1#200
jan-janssen wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
pyiron_workflow

Conversation

@jan-janssen

@jan-janssen jan-janssen commented Aug 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@liamhuber I guess I need your help here. I was able to update to 0.18.0 as it still had the _legacy interface but with 0.19.X it is a whole new interface.

@jan-janssen jan-janssen linked an issue Aug 3, 2026 that may be closed by this pull request
@jan-janssen
jan-janssen marked this pull request as draft August 3, 2026 16:26
@liamhuber

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I think it's probably best to yank and re-write the examples? You can now write them natively in PWD, then convert PWD to flowrep and run that; in the reverse direction a pyiron_workflow node always has a flowrep .recipe, and flowrep has tools to convert to PWD. So we shouldn't need any more explicit glue here, we can always walk back and forth at the recipe level via a single call in each direction to the recipe converters in flowrep.tools

@liamhuber

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I was thinking and it should be super easy to add to_/from_pwd methods onto the Workflow class, just as convenience shortcuts to the flowrep converters. I can take care of that later

@jan-janssen

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

I was thinking and it should be super easy to add to_/from_pwd methods onto the Workflow class, just as convenience shortcuts to the flowrep converters. I can take care of that later

That would be great - thanks a lot

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[New WfMS] Flowrep

2 participants